Terms of Service
Use when asked to draft or review terms of service (ToS) — the legal agreement governing how users may use a product or service — for general guidance only, not legal advice; always direct the reader to consult a qualified lawyer for their specific situation and jurisdiction. Distinct from a [[privacy-policy]], which governs data handling rather than usage rights and conduct.
Terms of service (ToS) is the legal agreement between a provider and a user that governs how the user may use a product or service: what's permitted, what's prohibited, who's liable if something goes wrong, and what happens if either side wants out. It's a binding contract, even when most users never read it.
This is general guidance for drafting a working document, not legal advice. Terms of service are enforceable contracts with real consequences, and requirements vary by jurisdiction and by what the product actually does. Always direct the reader to have a qualified lawyer review the final terms before publishing them.
Key components
- Acceptable use — what users are and aren't permitted to do with the service, stated specifically enough to be enforceable (vague prohibitions are hard to act on later).
- Account and termination terms — how accounts are created and closed, and under what conditions the provider can suspend or terminate access (violations, non-payment, discontinuing the service).
- Liability limitations — what the provider is and isn't responsible for if the service fails, causes loss, or is misused — this is one of the sections where jurisdiction-specific legal review matters most.
- Dispute resolution — how disagreements get resolved: governing law, arbitration vs. litigation, and venue.
- Changes-to-terms notice process — how and when the provider will notify users that the terms have changed, and whether continued use counts as acceptance.
Common pitfalls
- Terms that don't match what the product or marketing actually promises — if the marketing site promises a feature or guarantee the terms don't cover (or that the terms actually contradict), that gap is a real liability, not just an inconsistency.
- No clear process for notifying users of changes — silently editing terms and expecting acceptance to carry over is both a poor practice and, in many jurisdictions, not legally sufficient.
- Boilerplate copied from an unrelated product without adapting it — terms lifted from a template or a different company's product often reference features, data practices, or liability scenarios that don't match what this product actually does, which weakens enforceability and can create obligations the provider never intended.
- Vague acceptable-use language — a prohibition too vague to point to ("don't misuse the service") is hard to enforce against a specific bad actor later.
- Treating the ToS as a one-time document — a service that evolves (new features, new data practices, new regions) needs terms revisited alongside it, not left describing an earlier version of the product.
Learn more
- Privacy Policy for the companion legal document governing data collection and handling, rather than usage rights and conduct.
- Contract Review for the broader discipline of reviewing contract terms before they're signed or published.
- Non-Disclosure Agreement for a narrower legal agreement covering confidentiality specifically, rather than general service use.